Peer Assessment

In my ongoing attempt at helping my students to understand the difference between arithmetic and mathematics, I had my students do a peer assessment exercise on the papers they are writing to explain why certain arithmetic algorithms give correct answers (e.g. why long division gives the correct answer to a division question).

I had all of the students bring drafts of their papers in, and the students had self-assessed their papers by “traffic-lighting:” a mark of green at the top of the paper means that the student thinks that the paper is close to being the final draft, a “red” means that they think they have a long way to go, and a “yellow” is somewhere in between. I then grouped the students by “traffic-light,” planning on having the “green” group and “yellow” group read each other’s papers and offer feedback, while the “red” group would work with me directly to get them on track. The reality is that pretty much everyone gave themselves a “yellow,” so this was not much of a differentiation. (I stole this whole idea from Assessment for Learning: Putting it into Practice).

Here is what I learned:

  1. This seemed to be extremely helpful to some students. I asked some students what they learned, and they told me exactly what I had hoped they had gotten out of it.
  2. I am not very good at organizing peer assessment sessions yet. I got the sense that many students did not know what they were supposed to be doing, and consequently they were off-task and/or left a couple minutes early. I also think that this might not warrant an entire class period.

I am hoping that I look back on this in five years and laugh at how hard this was for me in 2011. In the meantime, I would love any advice that people have on peer assessment—I really do need to improve on this.

Advertisements

Tags: , , ,

4 Responses to “Peer Assessment”

  1. Aaron Says:

    Did you try giving the students a (reasonably detailed) rubric?

    • bretbenesh Says:

      Yes and no. We have been working on the rubric for some time, but I did not give them a copy that day. However, I did lead the discussion to focus on the portion of the rubric that I wanted them to focus on.

      So I think the best answer is “yes, but I should have been even more explicit.” Bret

  2. bretbenesh Says:

    I had two great responses on Facebook: Kim Nicholas sent me a bunch of documents on how to do peer assessment. Emilie Wiesner suggested that I have the students do the reading of the other student’s paper at home, and use the class time simply for reporting to the other person.

    Thanks!
    Bret

  3. SBF « Solvable by Radicals Says:

    […] fact, once we do this, we are awfully close to Assessment FOR Learning…stuff (I needed a fourth word for my fourth link. The proper term is Assessment FOR […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: